Year-Round Contracts vs. Seasonal Agreements: Which Saves You More?

Year-Round Contracts vs. Seasonal Agreements Which Saves You More

Four seasons, one partnership — consistent care that keeps your properties looking their best year-round. 

Many Facility Managers Ask the Same Question:

Should we sign seasonal agreements or commit to year-round contracts?

At first glance, seasonal contracts seem like the flexible, cost-smart option. You can shop around each year, adjust to budgets, and keep control. But in reality, year-round agreements often deliver greater savings, fewer surprises, and stronger partnerships — especially for multi-site portfolios where consistency and communication matter most.


The Case for Seasonal Agreements

Seasonal agreements give facilities short-term flexibility. You can hire for snow removal in winter and landscaping in spring or summer, often without long commitments.

Advantages:

  • Adjust budgets seasonally or year to year

  • Test new vendors or regional providers

  • Useful for unpredictable weather zones

Disadvantages:

  • Pricing spikes when demand surges (especially for snow)

  • Crews may not be familiar with your sites

  • Administrative burden managing multiple contracts and renewals

Example: A retailer who rebids snow removal every winter may pay 10–15% more than clients with multi-year coverage, due to labor shortages and equipment availability.


The Case for Year-Round Contracts

A year-round agreement provides stability — in both service and spend. You get predictable costs, consistent crews, and proactive care that prevents emergencies later.

Advantages:

  • Budget predictability: Fixed pricing across all seasons

  • Priority service: Your sites are top of the route list when storms hit

  • One vendor, one certificate, one contact: Simplifies compliance and management

  • Preventive savings: Routine off-season site checks reduce damage and rework

But the real difference goes deeper than pricing.


Why Year-Round Contracts Build True Partnerships

When a vendor works your sites month after month — not just in one season — they begin to understand your properties as well as your own team does.

That consistency turns a contract into a partnership:

  • Shared accountability: Vendors are invested in long-term outcomes, not one-off invoices.

  • Better communication: Year-round contact creates real relationships with your property teams.

  • Proactive solutions: Issues spotted in summer landscaping (like drainage or grading) can be fixed before snow season — saving time, cost, and liability.

  • Stronger brand protection: A partner who understands your expectations year-round helps maintain consistent curb appeal and safety standards across every location.

At SGM, many of our longest client relationships started as seasonal contracts — but evolved into year-round partnerships once both sides saw the value of continuous care and communication.


Total Cost of Ownership: What Really Adds Up

Contract Type Flexibility Predictability Cost Over Time Vendor Relationship
Seasonal High Low Higher Transactional
Year-Round Moderate High Lower Partnership

Seasonal flexibility feels appealing up front — but unpredictable weather, fuel surcharges, and administrative labor all drive up your true cost of ownership. Year-round contracts flatten those spikes and reward consistency and collaboration.


When a Hybrid Model Works Best

Some properties — especially in mild climates — see benefits from a hybrid structure:

  • Year-round for landscaping and site inspections

  • Seasonal for snow, only in higher-risk regions

SGM tailors each plan to your risk profile, regional needs, and service expectations.


SGM’s Approach: One Source, Total Coverage

At Strategic Grounds Management, we design contracts around outcomes, not months. Our year-round clients enjoy consistent crews, proactive communication, and peace of mind that every site is covered — rain, snow, or shine.

 

  • There are no suggestions because the search field is empty.

Recent Posts